Showing posts with label CCTV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CCTV. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

A sensible view on ID cards

Retired law lord Lord Steyn has spoken out on the folly of identity cards.

In a London memorial lecture, Lord Steyn warned that ID cards, and the national identity database which will store the personal data, are steps towards a 'Kafkaesque' society.

He accused the Home Office of introducing the cards step by step as a way of 'conditioning' and 'softening up' public opinion.

Ministers say the scheme will help fight terrorism, crime and illegal immigration and help people easily prove their identity.

But Lord Steyn says there is 'absolutely no evidence' they would protect the country against terrorism. Their introduction was an unjustified 'invasion' of civil liberties, the former judge added.

He said: 'The commitment, by and large, of the British people to European constitutional principles and ideals does not require us to adopt an ID card system.

'In my view a national identity card system is not necessary in our country. No further money should be spent on it. The idea should be abandoned.

'The Home Office now proudly asserts that comprehensive surveillance has become routine. If that is true, the resemblance to the world of Kafka is no longer so very distant.'

'To illustrate the scale of the surveillance, one can refer to the estimated 4.2 million CCTV cameras in operation in this country. It is said that a person living and working in London is likely to be filmed about 300 times on an average day.

'The cost to the taxpayer is several hundred millions of pounds. No doubt CCTV coverage has, in some cases, proved effective in combating crime. But it is unclear how cost effective generally the system is. Some of the types of surveillance introduced by the State border on the ridiculous.'

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

More madness from the Mad Mullah...

Just when you think that perhaps just perhaps, he has learned some common sense, up pops Richard Brunstrom, the idiot who runs North Wales Police Force.

Brunstrom writes on his blog about the recent furore about councils misusing CCTV to prosecute people who, for example, do not clean up after their dogs.

He says: “Research clearly and repeatedly shows that our citizenry in the UK is very comfortable with today’s surveillance society; CCTV makes people (including me) feel safer. The research also shows the importance of local issues – a clean and tidy environment has a much bigger impact on most people’s quality of life than does the burglary rate.

“Crime is now so low... that ‘traditional’ crime has become if not a rarity then certainly unusual.”

What planet is this man on? I hardly know where to begin.

Firstly, even senior policemen agree that CCTV does not work. Detective Chief Inspector Mick Neville, the officer in charge of the Metropolitan police force unit says "CCTV was originally seen as a preventative measure. Billions of pounds has been spent on kit, but no thought has gone into how the police are going to use the images and how they will be used in court. It’s been an utter fiasco: only 3 per cent of crimes were solved by CCTV. There's no fear of CCTV. Why don’t people fear it? [They think] the cameras are not working.”

Secondly, Brunstrom claims that “our citizenry in the UK is very comfortable with today’s surveillance society”. I would dispute that but if you spend a long time telling people that they have something to fear and that only CCTV (or 42 day detention or ID cards) will save them, it is hardly surprising that they will agree with you.

Thirdly, “‘traditional’ crime has become if not a rarity then certainly unusual”. This on the day that another teenager was stabbed to death in London.

Richard Littlejohn in his Daily Mail column today also has a story about the Mad Mullah.

Up Mad Mullah Creek without a paddle – you’re nicked

The Mad Mullah of the Traffic Taliban has extended his reign of terror from the roads to the waterways.


North Wales Police have arrested, fingerprinted, photographed and taken a DNA swab from a man accused of the heinous crime of canoeing without a permit.


Nigel Conway refused on principle to pay the £3 demanded by a rafting company to paddle along an 830-yard stretch of the River Dee in Llangollen.


The company leases the bank from a local landowner and believes it is entitled to charge others to use the river.


Mr Conway said: “I refused to pay because everyone should have the right to access water free of charge.”


The firm reported him to the police and a week later he had his collar felt. He was taken to the station and interviewed for two hours in connection with “obtaining services dishonestly” under Section 11 of the Fraud Act. He’s on police bail, awaiting charges.


This is despite the fact that there is no specific law relating to access to rivers in England and Wales.


“It was such a joke, even the officers at the station were laughing,” said Mr Conway.


Sorry, but it’s not funny. It’s monstrous. The rafting firm should have been told to take a running jump. At the very best, this was a mere civil dispute.


How dare the police arrest an innocent canoeist and treat him like a criminal? I hope he sues the leather motorcycling pants off the Mad Mullah and forces him to destroy his fingerprint and DNA samples.


Chief Constable Brunstrom runs North Wales like one of those deranged, sadistic sheriffs in some American Deep South hick town. I’m only surprised Mr Conway wasn’t breathalysed, too.

How long before the Mad Mullah gets round to putting up speed cameras on the banks of the River Dee?

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

CCTV doesn't work - even the police agree now

For some time I have been saying that CCTV is next to useless in the fight against crime and has allowed the police to abjure their responsibilities.

Now, a senior policeman agrees with me. Detective Chief Inspector Mike Neville, the head of the Metropolitan Police Force's Visual Images, Identifications and Detections Office, said that the system was an "utter fiasco" - with only 3 per cent of London's street robberies being solved using cameras.

He said, "Billions of pounds has been spent on kit, but no thought has gone into how the police are going to use the images and how they will be used in court. It's been an utter fiasco: only 3 per cent of crimes were solved by CCTV."

Hmm, here's a radical idea - why not police patrols back on the streets?